Well I’m back after a bit of a break. In addressing this session I’ve omitted an inital paragraph about immenent conflict and psychotronic weapons. I never quite know what to make of these reports on geostrategic conditions from the Confederation. Even if they’re accurate, how can they be useful to folks like us? These bulletins about the designs of major powers do not continue throughout the archive, but when they show up it’s difficult not to read fear in them, so I don’t like to emphasize them in my research. I’d like to think Latuii is cleverly pivoting the group’s anxious calling for this transient information into the wider point about polarity and the law of responsibility. But could it be that the situation in the early 1980s was so critical at that moment that the prayers of a few folks meditating in Louisville could make the difference?
I literally was thinking about both polarities finding the love in the moment while driving home from taking my wife to work this morning.
You intuit correctly; ‘love’ has multiple meanings and perhaps Beings as we should encourage and help popularize the idea that each typing or speaking of the word should be precisely clarified as to what sub-density of ‘love’ is being addressed.
I believe one of the channeled Beings said it best, that English has one word for it, but other languages have like 7 different words and there is less distortion when trying to teach/learn.
The inward polarity utilizes ‘experiential love’ in whatever chakra they are utilizing, or several, as they focus their light and continue to polarize. Their every action towards polarization is literally therefore truly love.
Not green ray love. Other chakra love.
Perhaps that’s what we should use… the colors/vibrations?
So the example above… instead of ‘experiential’ perhaps identify it as, say, blue love, or indigo love, or red love or root love.
True love allows all experiences. Can all experiences be sub-categorized as the visible light spectrum, and perhaps even sub-sub colors?